“It must be borne in mind that the tragedy of life doesn’t lie in not reaching your goal. The tragedy lies in having no goals to reach.” —Benjamin E. Mays
You may not realize the reason behind the name of this website. No, I didn’t name it The Physician Philosopher because it’s difficult to say and spelling it on a keyboard makes your hands hurt (rookie mistake?). While I am many things, two of the more interesting facets of who I am involves being a physician anesthesiologist and a prior philosophy major in college. Hence, The Physician Philosopher.
Since creating this site, I have maintained one overarching goal: teaching others how to use financial independence to combat the physician wellness problem that exists in our country. Whether you feel you are burned out or morally injured, financial independence can help you.
Given that we are always discussing financial independence, shouldn’t we spend some time defining it?
What is financial independence?
In philosophy, few things are more important than defining our terms. The reason definitions are so important is because entire conversations can be held in agreement (or disagreement), because we have not properly defined a word in the discussion.
I would argue that one of the most important terms in the personal finance blogosphere is the phrase “financial independence.” The irony should not be lost on you that the most important words need defining. Doesn’t everyone agree on the most important thing?
The short answer, of course, is no. While everyone agrees that financial independence is the number at which you are independent of a paycheck, and no longer need to work a normal job…
There are two different schools of thought when defining the math behind financial independence. Which one aligns with my way of thinking? Neither. And both. I hold to a hybrid between the two.
Let’s discuss each school of thought. Then, we will discuss how to combine the two models to give a real life definition of financial independence.
School Number 1: The 25-X / 4% Rule Model
The most common way people define financial independence is by calculating the following math:
- Determine your anticipated annual spending in retirement (yes, this means you have to track spending).
- Multiple the above number by 25
The number that results from the math above is your financial independence number. For example, if you determined that – once all of your debt is gone – you will require $100,000 each year in retirement, then your number is $100,000 x 25 = $2,500,000.
The reason that this math works out is because there is a corollary to the “25 x rule,” which is called “The 4% Rule.” This rule is based on the Trinity Study, which showed that you can spend 4% of your nest egg and remain relatively reassured that your funds would last 30 years (95-100% chance based on a 50% stock / 50% bond portfolio).
Many people subscribe to this line of thinking. It is certainly what is most frequently taught in the financial independene blogging community.
However, it’s not the only way to define financial independence, and leaving it here has gotten many bloggers in trouble who still earn income from their blogs!
The Passive Income Stream Model
When I started this site, I hadn’t realized how much I would love being an entrepreneur. Medical training doesn’t really expose us to the idea.
Now a fire has been lit inside of me, and it impacts the way I view much of my life. This business-like way of thinking has led me to pursue many side hustles. All of which will (hopefully) produce additional income streams.
My current and future passive income streams has included this website, my book (The Physician Philosopher’s Guide to Personal Finance), a medical invention, and prior medical expert witness work.
If you need another source of possible passive income ideas, I’ll point you to Passive Income MD’s List of Physician Side Hustles.
The reason to point this all out is that this can help to understand the other model of financial independence, which I’ll define as the following:
Financial Independence is the point at which your monthly passive income streams equal your monthly spending.
The concept is simple, yet important. If you have enough money coming in to cover your monthly spending, then you have reached a point where you are no longer dependent on your W-2 paycheck. Hello, financial independence!
This is an alternative way to define financial independence. And it certainly doesn’t follow the same math as The 25-X Model.
A classic example here is real estate. If you have enough passive income coming from rental properties that you own – or deals you are involved in – to cover your monthly spending, then you are financially independent.
The Hybrid Model
So, what is financial independence?
I think the debate between the two definitions is a bit of a false dichotomy. In this debate, I think we can have our cake and eat it, too.
Let’s look at an example. Let’s use the same number we gave in the first model: $100,000 annual spending. The traditional 25-X model would require us to grow a nest egg of $2,500,000.
Well, if our passive income amounts to $30,000 in annual income, then what remains ($70,000 in annual spending) – is what must come out of our retirement nest egg. Given the passive income stream, we now only need a nest egg of 25-X our annual $70,000 requirement = $1,750,000.
That’s a dramatic difference! We have shaved off $750,000 from our required savings number due to passive income. That’s powerful stuff.
A way to remember this is that for every $10,000 in annual income that you can reliably produce, this decreases your FI number by $250,000. This is the reason that passive income is so powerful! Even if it is’t truly “passive”.
Take Home: What is Financial Independence?
It’s amazing how a simple twist on definitions can produce dramatic results in our financial planning. Once we have painted the big picture of financial plan, we just have to figure out which financial independence model we plan to use. Remember, you can use both via the hybrid financial independence model!
Obviously, there are two inherent assumptions that are worth mentioning. First, the larger your multiplier on your annual income (i.e. 30-X instead of 25-X) the safer you are in knowing your money will last. Second, if you are going to depend on passive income, it needs to be very stable!
When thinking about financial independence, I hope that these two models will help. Don’t feel stuck in one model or the other. I certainly plan on using both! It’s part of the reason that I hustle so hard.
And THAT is how you can plan the goals you want to reach.
What is your definition of financial independence? Do you use one of the models above, a hybrid, or an all together different definition? Leave a comment below.